Jump to content

Bench press


Justadad
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was just wondering why we all put so much emphasis on the bench press? I understand that the bench is the first thing everyone wants to talk about when they hear weight lifting, but unless you walk around with a bench supporting your back isn't this lift a little overrated. I think we should emphasize the power clean and the parallel squat more in our programs. What do ya'll think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes squats and Power-cleans are more productive for football players, but bench press can be good too.

 

1) a player needs some type of upper-body development that involves the largest muscles in the upper body

2) it is a compound movement which means that you will use more than one muscle to do the lift. and doing heavy compound excersises will build size which football players need.

3) it is an ego booster which most kids need, and it generates some excitement in the workout because it is so popular

 

So, even though bench presses aren't as beneficial as squats or power-cleans to a football player, I wouldn't say that they were over-rated or unnecissary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When olympic lifting was three lifts including snatch, clean and jerk, and military press (up to 1972) you VERY RARELY heard of a rotator cuff problem. As the bench press has come into vogue, these injuries have become very common. The angle and torque of the bench press is anything but an injury preventor for the shoulder girdle. It is a decent upper body strength movement and nothing more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was not saying that the bench press is unnecessary. I understand that it is beneficial to a player's confidence, as well as to his upper body strength. I just think that the lifts that make you support the weight with nothing but your body weight are going to be more beneficial to your total body strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

crazebear,

Now you got me started ! Most shoulder injuries in football occur from over building the front and side delt while neglecting the rear delt. Anytime you work the chest you should work the back. I'm not saying to work the back as much as the chest, but in order to even things out,you should work the rear delt and lats. These muscles directly relate to shoulder injuries. Truth be known most shoulder injuries occur from underdeveloped rear delt and lat muscles ,most of the time. Think about shoulder injuries,most are caused by the shoulder being forced out of the socket towards the back.

Quick tip: alternating dumbell bench is much better than bar bench, for over all muscle development, in and around the chest/shoulder area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vols4me, since olympic lifting involves a lot of pulls it easily keeps the back and rear delts up to par. Many schools I have seen work the bench like crazy and merely go through the motions on cleans and squats. Form on cleans is atrocious and squat depth is usually non-existant. I just think the bench is WAY over-emphasized.

[Edited by bigchief on 2-14-03 12:50P]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • Recent Posts

    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
×
  • Create New...