Jump to content

AP Poll


PTSportsWriter
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

actually , i voted late monday morning but still voted greeneville number one. it was their first in state loss , a lot of things went into the 29 point defeat that the average voter across the state might not have had access to. but you are right , many vote early , or some don't do their homework before they vote , because the "how they fared" listing that comes out over the weekend does not include the saturday games , such as greeneville-science hill and austin east-fulton which were both played on saturday. I am glad we have a playoff system in place which takes care of all that. Have a great day man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Challenger @ Jan 30 2007 - 03:29 AM) 826351314[/snapback]

actually , i voted late monday morning but still voted greeneville number one. it was their first in state loss , a lot of things went into the 29 point defeat that the average voter across the state might not have had access to. but you are right , many vote early , or some don't do their homework before they vote , because the "how they fared" listing that comes out over the weekend does not include the saturday games , such as greeneville-science hill and austin east-fulton which were both played on saturday. I am glad we have a playoff system in place which takes care of all that. Have a great day man.

 

 

 

I dont mean to be disrespectful, but how can Greeneville still be number 1 on your ballot after losing by 29! I could understand if it was by a few points or so, but a team of that caliber or supposed caliber doesnt have lopsided loses like that, and even then how can you justify keeping them at the top spot when pretty much everyone else in the top 10 won this past week?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no offense taken , and by the way i did vote oakland second. it was greenevilles first in state loss and knowing the situation as i do , i felt ok in the number one vote still. like i said , i am glad we don't have to rely on the media to vote #1 in the state , and have a playoff system that takes care of it for us. good luck oakland , hope to see you at the state....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is R-E calling Oakland out? Well then..why dont they just come on up and play a game? Then everyone can stop cryin about who needs to be number 1. I guess we will have to wait till they come to MTSU. Oh heck...thats Oaklands back yard. Everyone stop being little homos and we'll take it out back...if R-E comes to play. Same goes with Greeneville.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Challenger @ Jan 30 2007 - 03:29 AM) 826351314[/snapback]

actually , i voted late monday morning but still voted greeneville number one. it was their first in state loss , a lot of things went into the 29 point defeat that the average voter across the state might not have had access to. but you are right , many vote early , or some don't do their homework before they vote , because the "how they fared" listing that comes out over the weekend does not include the saturday games , such as greeneville-science hill and austin east-fulton which were both played on saturday. I am glad we have a playoff system in place which takes care of all that. Have a great day man.

 

 

 

 

Challenger..do you vote for Single A,Double A,etc..I am just curious..and this is to all the voters...Temple was ranked #2 in the State last week and lost to Pickett Co ,a team that wasn't ranked at the time by 10 points..Temple didn't fall a spot at all..Lake Co was ranked #3 and lost to the #1 team in the State by only 2 points.and dropped a spot..Lost by fewer points and to a higher ranked opponent ..Do the voters as far as you know even look at the schedules in West Tenn or do you just go by the record..see that they lost and drop them?Or I guess there's more papers in Middle and East Tenn..so they keep their teams up there..I'm not writing because Lake Co is ranked #4 and because I think should be higher..I've seen some games that even I wouldn't have them in the top 10..I'm just saying that you have two teams..one lost to a higher ranked team by fewer points and dropped while the other team didn't..I'm not saying Temple isn't the #2 team in the State and that Grace isn't the #3 team in the state..Just wondering what the criteria is...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(OakIand @ Jan 29 2007 - 08:09 PM) 826350887[/snapback]

Oakland hasn't lost one in-state game and Only other was to the best team in Alabama sooooooooo.

 

Oakland is a Joke and everyone will see that. R.E. is Number one. That AP garbage is so political. You will not hear about Oakland, Pigeon Forge, Science Hill or Greenville after Tourney time. These teams are so overrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Jumpshot @ Jan 29 2007 - 06:31 PM) 826350775[/snapback]

Pray tell how Greeneville lost (by a lot), #2 Raleigh Egypt continues to win and all of a sudden Oakland jumps from #3 to number 1. This is EXACTLY why you AP pollsters get no respect for your opinions. It just infuriates me that you would keep choosing to screw over a bunch of very deserving kids. It will all come out in the wash but you guys just need to know how pathetic this looks!

 

 

The Oakland kids must just not be as deserving.

 

QUOTE(Jumpshot @ Jan 29 2007 - 06:42 PM) 826350786[/snapback]

You know OF COURSE that the strength of schedule list on here is a bunch of hooey! They don't factor in teams that are from out of state in the standings of strength. Ral-Egypt has played AND DEFEATED FIVE OUT OF SIX TEAMS WITH NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED PROGRAMS AND PLAYED THE #5 TEAM in the nation, SO. MEDFORD DOWN TO THE WIRE BEFORE TWO STARTERS FOULED OUT. Just take a look at each teams schedule on here and tell me with a straight face that Greeneville, Oakland or a half dozen others teams you've ranked so high actually plays as TOUGH a schedule.

 

 

National rankings are even more of a joke than these same state rankings you are complaining about. Bottom line, Oakland has lost zero games in the state, and RE has lost 1. From someone who hasn't seen either team play, who would you pick? I am not saying that OHS would beat RE, RE might really be the best team in the state.....but so could OHS.

 

QUOTE(nebuntyn @ Jan 30 2007 - 11:54 AM) 826351620[/snapback]

Oakland is a Joke and everyone will see that. R.E. is Number one. That AP garbage is so political. You will not hear about Oakland, Pigeon Forge, Science Hill or Greenville after Tourney time. These teams are so overrated.

 

 

How many times have you watched Oakland play this year? Do they still play the city champhionship in Memphis? If so, what day will that be played?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Yeah.  Kids only transfer in and out of Bearden these days, you know.   That particular poster evidentially has a personal vendetta with Josh Jones.   Consider the source.  And the kid transferring to McCallie is a terrific talent, but an opportunity to go to McCallie on scholarship (and I am assuming that is the case) is one that is very much beneficial both athletically and academically.  McCallie is a great school for both.   Bearden will be fine.  And so will both of those kids who decided with their parents/advisors to go elsewhere.  
    • I think we are conducting interviews now since we have so many wanting to come to school here and play for a real team with a chance to play in front of lot's of fan's and have a chance to win a championship every year.  
    • Esteemed colleagues, On this auspicious Saturday morning, I fortuitously encountered Dr. Satterfield at the Early Bird Cafe, whereupon we engaged in a discourse concerning the pool of candidates vying for a coveted position. Dr. Satterfield, possessing a discerning eye, has graciously shared insights into the contenders, which I shall now relay to you in a structured manner. Eric Vetetoe, though initially absent from my considerations, ascended to the zenith of Clint's roster, poised atop his discerning clipboard as a preeminent candidate. Kyle Gregory, with a coaching demeanor reminiscent of a bygone era, has captivated Clint's admiration. His interview performance, I am informed, left an indelible impression, aligning seamlessly with Clint's nostalgic sentiments. Davy Cothron's cerebral approach to offense, notwithstanding a past championship game setback, garners high praise from Dr. Satterfield. His strategic acumen, it appears, remains unblemished despite previous trials. Brandon Eden's steadfast allegiance to the team, evidenced by his tenure on the creekbank, earns him considerable favor in Clint's estimation. Anticipation lingers as to whether an offer may be extended in recognition of his unwavering dedication. Wesley Satterfield emerges as a compelling candidate following a favorable assessment by Mr. Satterfield himself. The prospect of a Satterfield succession holds a certain allure, embodying continuity and tradition in equal measure. Kyle Shoulders, a surprising entrant in the applicant pool, impresses Clint with his football intellect, potentially positioning him as a contender for the role. Josh Hackett's defensive prowess, particularly in encounters against Trousdale over recent years, earns commendation from Coach Satterfield, underscoring his proficiency in the strategic aspects of the game. John McNeal's track record of success across multiple sports affords him undeniable merit, though the prospect of his acceptance, if offered, remains uncertain. Chad Evitts, a former NFL luminary, presents a unique opportunity, recognized keenly by Mr. Satterfield, to infuse our program with elite expertise and experience. Matt Dyer, revered for his contributions during the regular season, faces scrutiny for his playoff performances, a dichotomy that weighs upon Clint's evaluation. Chuck Gentry, endorsed by Dr. Satterfield, embodies the promise of transformative leadership, drawing parallels to his past triumphs in revitalizing programs akin to ours. Clint extols BJ West's astute management at the middle school echelon, where his strategic maneuver of strategically calibrating the team's schedule to optimize performance stands as a testament to his sagacity and acumen in navigating competitive dynamics. In conclusion, the deliberations surrounding our prospective leadership remain nuanced and multifaceted, underscoring the significance of this decision in shaping the future trajectory of our esteemed institution.  
    • Unfortunately we did after the first hire, that's why we tried to fight it so bad. this is a bad situation for our community and school.
×
  • Create New...