Metro Rankings

[FBfan26]

41 minutes ago, bleacher said:

So who had the most impressive win tonight?

After looking at the scores tonight is this a  Sarcastic question lol...but I do have a  comment. Idk how Laverne scored 23 on CR. They must put the young boys in. 

[midtnmale]

8 hours ago, bleacher said:

So who had the most impressive win tonight?

I would say John Overton's win over Stewart Creek may be close to impressive, in its proper context.

[bleacher]

On 8/25/2018 at 9:09 AM, bleacher said:

After week 2

1 Cane Ridge

2 Pearl Cohn

3 East

4 Maplewood

5 Hillsboro

6 Stratford

7 McGavock

8 Hillwood

9 Overton

10 Whites Creek

11 Antioch

12 Hunters Lane

13 Glencliff

 No change after wk 3 

5☆ 1 Cane Ridge

2 Pearl Cohn

 

4☆ 3 East

4 Maplewood

5 Hillsboro

 

3☆ 6 Stratford

7 McGavock

8 Hillwood

9 Overton

 

2☆ 10 Whites Creek

11 Antioch

 

1☆ 12 Hunters Lane

13 Glencliff

[Fballfan1978]

Stratford best HB they should be higher 

[AllRegion]

2 hours ago, Fballfan1978 said:

Stratford best HB they should be higher 

Stratford actually lost to Hillsboro

[Fballfan1978]

19 hours ago, AllRegion said:

Stratford actually lost to Hillsboro

I apologize I was thinking about Gallatin and they aren’t Metro.

[AllRegion]

4 hours ago, Fballfan1978 said:

I apologize I was thinking about Gallatin and they aren’t Metro.

You still have a good point, the Gallatin loss wasn’t a pretty one for Hillsboro

[bleacher]

Hillsboro has a very tough schedule and no home games makes it even tougher. 

 

[FBfan26]

15 hours ago, bleacher said:

Hillsboro has a very tough schedule and no home games makes it even tougher. 

 

I didnt know they was on the road all year

[bleacher]

6 hours ago, FBfan26 said:

I didnt know they was on the road all year

Remodeling their stadium this year and next.  Only home games will be 2 played at TSU and 1 at Vandy.

[bleacher]

Metro football seems more divided now than ever before in my time which dates back to the 70s.

There are several teams that seem to be talented , good teams. But three are even more that are an embarrassment to the game. 

Why is three such a difference from top to bottom?  Cane Ridge and Pearl Cohn are about 100 points better than Hunters Lane and Glencliff. Why?

[midtnmale]

42 minutes ago, bleacher said:

Metro football seems more divided now than ever before in my time which dates back to the 70s.

There are several teams that seem to be talented , good teams. But three are even more that are an embarrassment to the game. 

Why is three such a difference from top to bottom?  Cane Ridge and Pearl Cohn are about 100 points better than Hunters Lane and Glencliff. Why?

Hunters Lane sits between Davidson Academy and Goodpasture. And being zoned next to Maplewood isn't helping matters.  Kids want to play for a winning program. Or, at least one that can get them into the post-season.

As far back as I can recall (when I was in high school ), Glencliff has never been good. If they win more than two games a season they're having a good year. I think their long-term problem now is that there are too many first and second generations immigrants in their zone. You'd think they'd do better in soccer, though.