Jump to content

This Ryan mans Greenback team in 2019


Roy Dillard
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, WarChant said:

Good luck to the teams trying to cover Fields and Willis and don’t forget about stinnet.

 

Stinnett and Rutgerson will make their Mark quickly. There's no way you cannot double team Willis when you do that these other three kids are going to be extremely hard to cover one on one.BUT we HAVE to be able to run the ball!

Edited by orngnblk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheAmbassador said:

The one advantage SP had over Greenback in 2017 was the line play. Well.. that’s not the case anymore. That’s why I can’t take Greenback off the top line in 1A football. It doesn’t have anything to do with trying to remove a bullseye from SP. It’s simple analytics to me. 

Bass you played this game I played this game most everybody that post on this site has played this game.if you do not have a dominant O line and defensive line it's very hard to compete for championships and I haven't seen this line do anything yet so to me the jury is still out. Heck you can have the best quarterback in the country but if you can't block for him it's useless!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TheAmbassador said:

The one advantage SP had over Greenback in 2017 was the line play. Well.. that’s not the case anymore. That’s why I can’t take Greenback off the top line in 1A football. It doesn’t have anything to do with trying to remove a bullseye from SP. It’s simple analytics to me. 

The bullseye is squarely on South Pittsburgs back.The kind of kids you have down there are outstanding not to mention if you have around 60 kids you're going to be able to rotate a lot more than most of us.We don't have the depth that you do.It's going to be hard to compete with that plus bringing in good players that you've brought in the past couple years to go along with that........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, orngnblk said:

Bass you played this game I played this game most everybody that post on this site has played this game.if you do not have a dominant O line and defensive line it's very hard to compete for championships and I haven't seen this line do anything yet so to me the jury is still out. Heck you can have the best quarterback in the country but if you can't block for him it's useless!

 

4 minutes ago, orngnblk said:

The bullseye is squarely on South Pittsburgs back.The kind of kids you have down there are outstanding not to mention if you have around 60 kids you're going to be able to rotate a lot more than most of us.We don't have the depth that you do.It's going to be hard to compete with that plus bringing in good players that you've brought in the past couple years to go along with that........

At the end of the day it doesn’t matter what’s said on here. At the end of last season if both teams brought back the same returning players I gave SP the advantage. However, the new additions at Greenback appear to be more dynamic than the ones at SP. Again, both teams are good. I just think Greenback has too many weapons to go along with potential D1 kids. Back between 2007-2013 I could clearly see how SP was the team to beat year in and year out. However, the landscape in 1A has clearly changed since that time. If you want to put a bullseye on someone’s back that hasn’t sniffed Cookeville in 6 years and hasn’t won a gold ball in 9 years then so be it. Common sense should tell you otherwise though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TheAmbassador said:

 

At the end of the day it doesn’t matter what’s said on here. At the end of last season if both teams brought back the same returning players I gave SP the advantage. However, the new additions at Greenback appear to be more dynamic than the ones at SP. Again, both teams are good. I just think Greenback has too many weapons to go along with potential D1 kids. Back between 2007-2013 I could clearly see how SP was the team to beat year in and year out. However, the landscape in 1A has clearly changed since that time. If you want to put a bullseye on someone’s back that hasn’t sniffed Cookeville in 6 years and hasn’t won a gold ball in 9 years then so be it. Common sense should tell you otherwise though. 

How many kids did SP loose last year that started? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TheAmbassador said:

I believe 3 linemen, the TE, and the FB. So that’s 5 and if I’m not mistaken they all started both ways. 

Barney, you may be correct & with 4 transfer starters from surrounding programs that puts GB directly in the driver’s seat. It appears GB has the superior amount of skill personnel as starters! Why, them GB fellers even skeerd to have the target on their back! Their hearts are surely pounding fast. LOPAO 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...