Jump to content

Rule Question


BT Mafia
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, KWoodroof said:

A field goal attempt is a punt that can score. It belongs to the defending/receiving team where the ball is downed (or returned). If the ball breaks the plane of the endzone, it is a touchback.

 

I remember some years back where the team playing against us attempted a FG only to cover the ball and gain possession. The FG attempt was about 50 yards or so. The ball was covered near the 5 yard line. The other team gained possession and scored a few plays later. It was a designed play by the other team. The opposing team's coach was pretty sure our team was unaware that the ball was live. The other team didn't try to advance the ball into the end zone, but they made sure they covered the ball. I never forgot it.

Edited by kwc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Years ago I was broadcasting a Karns game and a coach by the name of Bankston (first name escapes me) kicked a "field goal" instead of punting because he had a tremendous place kicker, name was Foster if memory serves, and didn't have anybody who could put it 20 yards.  I thought he was nuts the first time I saw it, but as the game went on I began to understand why he did it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/7/2019 at 9:40 AM, blazer1set said:

What if Team A lines up for a long field goal.
The ball falls way short and comes to rest in the field of play, say at the 5.
Does Team B take over at the 5?
Or at the original line of scrimmage?
Or is it a live ball, like on a kickoff?

Team B I believe takes over at the 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/8/2019 at 11:38 AM, HTV said:

Years ago I was broadcasting a Karns game and a coach by the name of Bankston (first name escapes me) kicked a "field goal" instead of punting because he had a tremendous place kicker, name was Foster if memory serves, and didn't have anybody who could put it 20 yards.  I thought he was nuts the first time I saw it, but as the game went on I began to understand why he did it.  

HTV,

I think his name was David, but don't bet the ranch on it. His brother played at Auburn and transferred to APSU.  His name was Craig and I think a 3rd brother was a G.A. at Marshall along the time of their plane crash.  

Pretty sure the kicking team can't recover a missed FG att before the ball reaches the end zone and retain possession.

Edited by sheppy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Field Goal attempt is a scrimmage kick and is processed in the same manner as a punt is as a non scoring scrimmage kick.  According to NFHS rules section 2 scrimmage kicks, article 5:  paraphrased - the kicking team can catch or recover a scrimmage kick beyond the neutral zone however the possession turns over to the receiving team at the point of first touch by the kicking team.  Even if the kick is considered jointly possessed or recovered the possession turns over to the receiving team.  Without the receiving team touching the ball beyond the neutral  zone any call awarding the ball back to the kicking team is incorrect according to NFHS rules which TSSAA abides by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/7/2019 at 11:28 AM, blazer1set said:

That's what I thought.    So if a team has a great kicker, a guy who can drop it out the back of the end zone on a kickoff, but a really bad punter.... In that case if you had to punt on 4th down it might be better to try a 80 yard field goal, the purpose of course just to advance the ball way further down the field than the punter could.

If the receiving team let it go though, it would become a dead ball & go back to the original LOS...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/8/2019 at 12:38 PM, HTV said:

Years ago I was broadcasting a Karns game and a coach by the name of Bankston (first name escapes me) kicked a "field goal" instead of punting because he had a tremendous place kicker, name was Foster if memory serves, and didn't have anybody who could put it 20 yards.  I thought he was nuts the first time I saw it, but as the game went on I began to understand why he did it.  

I remember them playing Oak Ridge that year. I thought they were nuts for trying field goals instead of punting. They did it several times that night. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
    • No my fight, but ... if they were already college-caliber prior to transferring to BHS, and they already had FBS interest, and they end up at an FBS school, how did Bearden do anything for them?
×
  • Create New...