Jump to content

South Pittsburg vs Greenback (Grider against this Ryan man)


Roy Dillard
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, orngnblk said:

Question pujo did 2 of those four start at their last school.Bet you cant answer that,also have you ever heard of the two kids from WB before this year?I hadn't!

Ill answer for you because i KNOW you never heard their name because they were lost in the politics at WB and played behind players thst never should have been on the field.So you ask why they came Other than Carnes.THEY WANTED TO HAVE A CHANCE TO PLAY AND THEY EARNED IT HERE IT WASNT GAVE TO THOSE 2.Very hard working kids got the shaft at WB.

Never heard of any of them before this year. Doubt I'll ever hear of any of them after this year is over. Bet I'll hear some new names again next year. Tis what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, orngnblk said:

Question pujo did 2 of those four start at their last school.Bet you cant answer that,also have you ever heard of the two kids from WB before this year?I hadn't!

Ill answer for you because i KNOW you never heard their name because they were lost in the politics at WB and played behind players thst never should have been on the field.So you ask why they came Other than Carnes.THEY WANTED TO HAVE A CHANCE TO PLAY AND THEY EARNED IT HERE IT WASNT GAVE TO THOSE 2.Very hard working kids got the shaft at WB.

So you basically admitted they came for Athletic purposes.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, pujo said:

So you basically admitted they came for Athletic purposes.

What I don’t understand is why you think the reason they came matters? As long as they weren’t recruited or received benefits/help/aid in doing so, then it doesn’t matter. As long as they do it the right way and abide by TSSAA, then it’s legal. The TSSAA doesn’t have any governance over reason for transfer. A family can transfer for whatever reason they want. As long as they do it the right way. What I got from your post is that they aren’t allowed to transfer for athletic purposes? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, pujo said:

So you basically admitted they came for Athletic purposes.

Pujo i dont do admittance,they dont have to have my approval.They have a bona fide change of address they dont have to have ANY reason to come.If i was a betting man i would say no but what i think doesnt matter and there is no rule against them MOVING for any reason but their own.The change of address has no other rule it could be for either reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, pujo said:

Never heard of any of them before this year. Doubt I'll ever hear of any of them after this year is over. Bet I'll hear some new names again next year. Tis what it is.

Sicken Pujo! GB orchestrated the movement, only fools or fellers completely lost in the Smoke & Mirrors believe otherwise. A feller gots a nose full of skunk spray, it ain’t nor can it be mistaken fer anything else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, orngnblk said:

Pujo i dont do admittance,they dont have to have my approval.They have a bona fide change of address they dont have to have ANY reason to come.If i was a betting man i would say no but what i think doesnt matter and there is no rule against them MOVING for any reason but their own.The change of address has no other rule it could be for either reason.

I'd say thats correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MountainRebel said:

 Doesn't matter why the came. it has been investigated and it was legal no rules broken. cannot tell someone where they can or cannot live. this is America. after reading your post on here you reap of hypocrisy. 

And they all sold their homes and bought houses just so their kids could play one year of football. We'll nearly all, one will be moving back after the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • TSSAA restrictions for hiring non-faculty coaches have been removed for over a year at this point. In the past a non-faculty person had to be "grandfathered" by being an assistant coach for five years, being fingerprinted, and having a background check run per TSSAA rules... since those were rescinded, the board of directors for the school district are responsible for any/all restrictions on hiring non-faculty personnel. I guess what I'm saying to you is that if you really wanted what you posted, it's already possible as long as your local BOE will allow for it.
    • stop it, rlh. you’re gonna get me all misty eyed and sentimental.    i see seven fairly regularly. ….but slim shady, that’s like spotting bigfoot on main street. you just hope he doesn’t spot you. 
    • Are you trying to say you didn't find Seven and ShadySlim going at it?
    • hey goat! how’s monterey looking this year?! 
    • several people actually. they said “snoball, do you know who railbird81 is on coacht?” I said, “never heard of her.” they said, “you ought to check it out they’re getting fired up on there like the old days.” well, you can imagine my disappointment when I came here expecting sharp, witty banter and all i found was more akin to toddlers slap fighting. and what looks like 1 guy/gal talking to themselves with multiple accounts.
×
  • Create New...