Jump to content

Region 7-4A 2021 Outlook


BIGPURPLEMACHINE

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, stacmot said:

Haywood is # 1, but I'm in agreement with Odom that  2, 3, and 4 are not set yet!

If Milan beats North Side, both Milan and North Side will have 2 region losses. In the unlikely event that Crockett defeats South Gibson, the Hornets would have 3 loses.  In that case  Milan would own the tiebreaker over North Side making Milan 2 , North Side 3, South Gibson 4

If Milan beats North Side and South Gibson beats Crockett.  Milan, North Side, and South Gibson will finish with 3-2 region records.  The first tie breaker is the most  wins.  Depending on the outcome of this week's games, North Side could finish 6-4 or 5-5, Milan could finish 4-5 or 3-6, South Gibson could finish 6-4 or 7-3.  So it does seem possible that South Gibson (with 7 wins) could finish second, North Side third, Milan fourth.  

A North Side victory over Milan would avoid the 3 way tie and result in the finish you stated.    1. Haywood  2. North Side  3. South Gibson  4. Milan

I'm definitely not saying that my understanding or explanation is correct.  However, I would think the TSSAA will most likely release playoff probabilities this week.  Maybe that will clear things up for all of us.

 

Okay, then you’ll be right. I was informed that if North Side were to win last night against South Side, then the Indians would lock up the 2 seed because of the tiebreaker advantage. Not surprising they lost and won’t be surprised if they lose to Milan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TryNotToSuck said:

Okay, then you’ll be right. I was informed that if North Side were to win last night against South Side, then the Indians would lock up the 2 seed because of the tiebreaker advantage. Not surprising they lost and won’t be surprised if they lose to Milan.

If the Milan team shows up I watched against Hardin County last night, Northside will have there hands full. I think Milan wins this game. Just my opinion anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • While I appreciate being credited with multiple accounts, I have to say that is not true. Will you please report back to your people that I am not someone who provides sharp, witty banter, but rather someone who is putting the shoe on the other foot for some people that have been repeatedly bashing others here and in real life for the past few years? Everything that I have stated has been backed by factual evidence or public record, so no need to be sharp and witty. 
    • Yes this process is moving slower than I would have expected
    • also was told coady auston applied, he served as defensive coordinator for greenfield under don pitt several years ago before going to Obion county  
    • TSSAA restrictions for hiring non-faculty coaches have been removed for over a year at this point. In the past a non-faculty person had to be "grandfathered" by being an assistant coach for five years, being fingerprinted, and having a background check run per TSSAA rules... since those were rescinded, the board of directors for the school district are responsible for any/all restrictions on hiring non-faculty personnel. I guess what I'm saying to you is that if you really wanted what you posted, it's already possible as long as your local BOE will allow for it.
    • stop it, rlh. you’re gonna get me all misty eyed and sentimental.    i see seven fairly regularly. ….but slim shady, that’s like spotting bigfoot on main street. you just hope he doesn’t spot you. 
×
  • Create New...