Jump to content

Sectionals added To State tournament


WrestlinFan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, WrestlinFan said:

Region tournament will still place top 4, then an additional weekend (sectionals) will have the top 4 from their respective regions match up against their predetermined region partners (R1 v R2, R3 v R4, R5 v R6, R7 v R8). So an 8 wrestler sectional with the top 4 advancing to a 16 wrestler bracket at State.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, JSamson7 said:

Region tournament will still place top 4, then an additional weekend (sectionals) will have the top 4 from their respective regions match up against their predetermined region partners (R1 v R2, R3 v R4, R5 v R6, R7 v R8). So an 8 wrestler sectional with the top 4 advancing to a 16 wrestler bracket at State.

Actually, I like it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't like it.   Reducing the number of kids who go to state is not growing wrestling, wrestling interest, or wrestling popularity.

DII now gets their own tournament with no change in bracket size.  Go figure. 

In years past, a DII kid at state could go 2-2 and still get a state medal.  Now, in AA, you will have a lot of coaches who will rarely ever be able to get a state qualifier.

None of this makes any sense to me.  Why change anything if DII gets their own tournament? 

Edited by mat73557
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the Biggest Blunders I think the TSSAA could make.  All these years Finally getting the Large School to a True Double Elimination Format and Full 32 man Bracket, to now drop it to 16.

Makes no sense in the world to grow the Sport but limit the numbers. Other sports have more State Qualifiers and Opportunities why cut Wrestling Short?????

Since the Private D2 Schools are not going to be attending the State with everyone else, it should go back to a 32 Man Tourny, 

Do something right for Once and for the kids TSSAA.............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't disagree with you guys more on it being a bad thing.

For coaches trying to grow their program, they convince a kid in the hallway that comes from nothing to come out and join the wrestling team.  Even though he's a first year kid, he's varsity because he's the only kid in his weight class.  Then he wrestles in the region tournament and places top 4 because he won 1 match or in some regions- he places top 4 just by making weight.

 

Then his parents have to spend money thy don't have to pay for 2 nights at a hotel in Franklin or Chattanooga  because their son qualified for the State Tournament.  He has no business being in the tournament, so he gets pinned quick twice and is eliminated Thursday night.  Yes some programs are fortunate enough to be in a position where they pay for the cost, but I would bet that there's less than 25 public schools in the state that don't have to rely on parents paying.

 

That same kid then tells his coach, who's only trying to build a program and grow the sport of wrestling, his parents said he can't wrestle next year because they can't afford it.

 

This sectional now will sort those scenarios out to where the parents and coaches won't have as many unnecessary costs in building their programs and will really help grow the sport in schools and communities that aren't known for wrestling.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, mat73557 said:

I still don't like it.   Reducing the number of kids who go to state is not growing wrestling, wrestling interest, or wrestling popularity.

DII now gets their own tournament with no change in bracket size.  Go figure. 

In years past, a DII kid at state could go 2-2 and still get a state medal.  Now, in AA, you will have a lot of coaches who will rarely ever be able to get a state qualifier.

None of this makes any sense to me.  Why change anything if DII gets their own tournament? 

I also don't like having sectionals.  Why don't we have a real state tournament and use the following criteria for the individual tournament:  Everyone is back together, 16 districts across the state and a wrestler must place in the top 4 to advance to one of the 4 regional tournaments.  At the region a wrestler must place in the top 4 to advance to the state tournament which is a 16 man bracket.  

Everyone knows that Tennessee does not have the population base to justify having 3 individual state wrestling tournament.  California has 1 tournament, New Jersey has 1 tournament and even in PA they only have 2 tournaments.  Let's put the prestige back into even getting to the state tournament.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sx1234 said:

I couldn't disagree with you guys more on it being a bad thing.

For coaches trying to grow their program, they convince a kid in the hallway that comes from nothing to come out and join the wrestling team.  Even though he's a first year kid, he's varsity because he's the only kid in his weight class.  Then he wrestles in the region tournament and places top 4 because he won 1 match or in some regions- he places top 4 just by making weight.

 

Then his parents have to spend money thy don't have to pay for 2 nights at a hotel in Franklin or Chattanooga  because their son qualified for the State Tournament.  He has no business being in the tournament, so he gets pinned quick twice and is eliminated Thursday night.  Yes some programs are fortunate enough to be in a position where they pay for the cost, but I would bet that there's less than 25 public schools in the state that don't have to rely on parents paying.

 

That same kid then tells his coach, who's only trying to build a program and grow the sport of wrestling, his parents said he can't wrestle next year because they can't afford it.

 

This sectional now will sort those scenarios out to where the parents and coaches won't have as many unnecessary costs in building their programs and will really help grow the sport in schools and communities that aren't known for wrestling.

Sorry, but this doesnt make any sense to me.  A coach who is trying to grow his program recruits a kid and the kid ends up being a state qualifier.  That is bad for his program because the kid isn't one of the top kids in the state, gets put out early, and his parents are probably poor?  Do I have that right?

Most coaches I know would love to be able to recruit more kids from their hallways.

"Come wrestle for me.  None of my kids will ever go to state, but man you're gonna have a lot of fun." 

I am sure that pitch is going to have the kids coming out in droves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, mat73557 said:

Sorry, but this doesnt make any sense to me.  A coach who is trying to grow his program recruits a kid and the kid ends up being a state qualifier.  That is bad for his program because the kid isn't one of the top kids in the state, gets put out early, and his parents are probably poor?  Do I have that right?

Most coaches I know would love to be able to recruit more kids from their hallways.

"Come wrestle for me.  None of my kids will ever go to state, but man you're gonna have a lot of fun." 

I am sure that pitch is going to have the kids coming out in droves.

Comical attempt to try and twist words to build rhetoric there. However, sadly ,the universe in under no obligation to make sense to you.  Reality exists whether you understand it or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My personal opinion is that we seem to be undervaluing the significance of what being a state qualifier may mean to some kids, that is the goal  in many instances and I think that's just fine and keeps them involved in the sport. I  am on my 3rd son wrestling and I can say without hesitation that  I would be as equally or more excited about my youngest son qualifying for the State Tournament as my older son winning it.  They are different kids with different skill levels and different goals , that's perfectly ok. I don't think the ask is to water down the Tournament to the point where a State Champ feels like it was not an accomplishment but what would it hurt to keep some of the low hanging fruit in play  for those kids trying to just qualify  for the tournament as the  goal, doesn't keeping more kids engaged ultimately grow the sport? I think the 32 man Bracket did just that IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • This whole situation is bonkers. You don’t just kick your star player off the team just because you heard them say the F word; the coach definitely had something against the player, or somebody definitely did. Also, nobody has brought up the idea that the school blackmailed the college to get the college to withdraw the scholarship offer, not to mention that the coach who kicked her off is no longer even with the program; they were fired. I think this is a pretty easy lawsuit. I don’t know if she should deserve that much money, but I think she should get enough money for a full-ride scholarship if she cannot get one after this situation.
    • Oh yeah, I’m sure you are different people just always on the same thread for some reason, always agreeing with each other, perhaps just a bunch of dorks who would like to ###### and moan about high school football coaches do a lot of other students, so you make a football team and get a yell at them. When they do something wrong, but I’m sure you don’t like that, do you?   and I’m sure I’m aware of where you get information. A teacher who was on the coaching staff but was fired after the new coaching and staff came in and realized he actually had to start taking his assistant job a little bit more seriously than just wanting to make a little extra cash on the side, hardly even showing up to most practices, should’ve left with his buddy to go to Farragut. I’m sure he could get him a defensive coaching job, but I doubt he will be there in three years. Looking at the way Farragut is currently going.
    • It may be hard to believe but there’s more people than me that think you guys are a bunch of losers.    I’m sure the coaching staff, yourself included, cursed at a bunch of high school students. Nobody could name more than 3 coaches on staff due to the constant turnover. 
    • That's complete BS.  Nobody at ACHS has access to CHS student records unless a transfer is made from CHS to ACHS.  
    • Trez's last scandal has died down, so I guess this is there opportunity to be the best 4A team playing in 2A a la Sissy MTN.  At least they won't be in a Z-district with 1a teams in the regular season.
×
  • Create New...