Jump to content

TSSAA D2 success factor


theawesomebro
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, URSUS said:

Interesting that other privates are calling for this.  There is a divide between boarding and non-boarding schools in Div. 2

There are several reasons there is a divide between the boarding schools and non boarding schools:

1.  Kids that are going to boarding schools to play football only to leave and go back home the Monday after winning a state championship

2. You are allowed to already have an athletic record established and transfer to a boarding school and you are eligible immediately. 

3.  Boarding schools do not have to develop a roster but merely recruit a new roster every season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They could just simplify everything and do European soccer style promotion and relegation. Top 10% of teams move up, bottom 10% move down every year. Could do this with all classes and schools together. Winning the biggest trophy brings the most prestige. Obviously this will never happen, but it’s a proven competitive model across multiple sports and countries. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/8/2023 at 3:30 PM, Indian said:

How you you figure in transfers when a transfer may have moved on by the time the new classification takes effect?

Same way you figure enrollment. That enrollment isn’t the same when the new class takes effect. Why not do transfers the same way?  I think that these numbers should be a three year average prior to the new class taking effect. That would be more realistic and fair in my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/9/2023 at 5:01 AM, theawesomebro said:

appreciate the feedback.  what's the % in indiana?  to play devil's advocate, im not sure 10% is huge but I think the same team winning over and over is boring and not great for the sport/division.  everyone wants a shot at some point.

I think that if you reach the state finals 2 years in a row that you are bumped up in class during the next classification period. Don't quote me on that though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
15 hours ago, theawesomebro said:

maybe a committee made up of all the members of coacht?

Bumping a team up is easy but deciding who can go back down isn’t. If state championships are the measure for bumping up then what level of lack of success lowers a school? Do they bump up or down in all sports?

IMO this is why it’s a very bad model. It’s too difficult for teams to be lowered in classifications. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 6/26/2023 at 7:10 AM, Playerscoach said:

Bumping a team up is easy but deciding who can go back down isn’t. If state championships are the measure for bumping up then what level of lack of success lowers a school? Do they bump up or down in all sports?

IMO this is why it’s a very bad model. It’s too difficult for teams to be lowered in classifications. 

Hopefully this sheds more light on Indiana’s system. 
https://legacy.ihsaa.org/Portals/0/ihsaa/documents/Tournament Success Factor/Tournament Success Factor Provisions.pdf

 

I remember talking to the Cathedral folks about this. They were moved up from 4A to 5A when we played them. They are now in 6A because of the success factor. You can only move up one classification ever 2 years with their system. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rhea Co. said:

Hopefully this sheds more light on Indiana’s system. 
https://legacy.ihsaa.org/Portals/0/ihsaa/documents/Tournament Success Factor/Tournament Success Factor Provisions.pdf

 

I remember talking to the Cathedral folks about this. They were moved up from 4A to 5A when we played them. They are now in 6A because of the success factor. You can only move up one classification ever 2 years with their system. 

Thanks for researching this. It is more complicated than I remember. I am still 100% against this. However,  if the TSSAA is foolish enough to impliment this, it must apply to public schools as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/10/2023 at 2:25 PM, cbg said:

There are several reasons there is a divide between the boarding schools and non boarding schools:

1.  Kids that are going to boarding schools to play football only to leave and go back home the Monday after winning a state championship

2. You are allowed to already have an athletic record established and transfer to a boarding school and you are eligible immediately. 

3.  Boarding schools do not have to develop a roster but merely recruit a new roster every season.

Non-boarding privates get around this, just staying with an unofficial host family on weeknights. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...