Jump to content

Florida proposes unique playoff format - Can TN something similar?


Recommended Posts

Amid heated debate over our own postseason format, Florida's FHSAA has proposed something completely different than anything seen here. It could go into effect there as early as 2017.

 

http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/high-school/article77312762.html

 

The gist:

-No more districts, only regions

-Playoff births and seeds based solely on points system

-Points are earned by playing teams with more wins, with more points being awarded if you beat them.

-Bonus points for playing up a class.

 

What do you think of this? While it is unlikely that an exact copy will be implemented by the TSSAA, I think this could be considered as a model for whenever the playoffs are up for realignment. One of my favorite parts about the highly unpopular "Z-Plan" was that every game counted for something. But one of the worst parts was the fact that teams would less likely to play good teams. That being said, it needs to be popular, so what do you guys think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Amid heated debate over our own postseason format, Florida's FHSAA has proposed something completely different than anything seen here. It could go into effect there as early as 2017.

 

http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/high-school/article77312762.html

 

The gist:

-No more districts, only regions

-Playoff births and seeds based solely on points system

-Points are earned by playing teams with more wins, with more points being awarded if you beat them.

-Bonus points for playing up a class.

 

What do you think of this? While it is unlikely that an exact copy will be implemented by the TSSAA, I think this could be considered as a model for whenever the playoffs are up for realignment. One of my favorite parts about the highly unpopular "Z-Plan" was that every game counted for something. But one of the worst parts was the fact that teams would less likely to play good teams. That being said, it needs to be popular, so what do you guys think?

Horrible idea and logistics nightmare.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong cause it was before my time. But several decades ago wasn't the playoffs on a point system??

Yes.  I remember Maryville being undefeated along with Knox Rule in 1970 and Maryville had more points based on opponents.  Maryville went to the playoffs and won a state championship while undefeated Rule stayed home.  Two years later the playoffs began to expand in an effort to minimize the effect of the point system.

 

Sounds like Florida is going back in time.  Bad idea.  We've been there.

Edited by OldRebel2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with playoff systems that make it really hard to make the playoffs is they aren't fair. Some regions/districts are much tougher than others. People who want to make it tougher to get into the playoffs say it would make the playoffs more exciting and there would be less blowouts. That isn't true by any stretch of the imagination. The "good" teams from weak regions that make the playoffs would still get blown out. It wouldn't change anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want the playoffs to be more difficult you can do the following:

 

Place both D1 & D2 back together

Have Class AAAA, AAA, AA & A

Non financial aid giving private schools must play in AA, AAA or AAAA

Financial aid giving private schools must play in AAA or AAAA

Go back to districts and only take the champion & runner up to the playoffs

All remaining teams with 6 wins are invited to go to a bowl game if invited.

 

Now how many of you want to go this direction?

Edited by cbg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Ohio had the playoff system where you got points for beating people with a better record and in a bigger class or has that been changed?

Yes, Ohio does something similar, and it works pretty well. Biggest issue in Ohio is that there is no public-private split, and that is still a major debate. The parochial/private schools tend to dominate most sports. 

Edited by osunut2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want the playoffs to be more difficult you can do the following:

 

Place both D1 & D2 back together

Have Class AAAA, AAA, AA & A

Non financial aid giving private schools must play in AA, AAA or AAAA

Financial aid giving private schools must play in AAA or AAAA

Go back to districts and only take the champion & runner up to the playoffs

All remaining teams with 6 wins are invited to go to a bowl game if invited.

 

Now how many of you want to go this direction?

question I have seen bowl games on here but was kind of curious is that like a county school thing because I never heard about a metro school playing in a bowl game??
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...