Jump to content

Round 3 Fairley @ Peabody


Goldenpride
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Golddoctor said:

That kind of flawed last years game.  Both teams had some major injuries.  I would love to see both teams healthy this year. With that said. They both were the best two teams in 2A last year.  Possibly this year

Yeah it’s crazy to think about the battle in that game and it could have been that much better, maybe this year it will happen. Watertown will be a tough out and likely Meigs will be extremely tough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Golddoctor said:

Nasty against who? 

But please don't respond to us with Good season Fairely-Good win Peabody.  Eat your crow and I will eat mine if necessary.

1) Look at the common opponents comparison I just posted.

2) Why on earth shouldn't I respond the way I've responded in the past in other threads? Eat CROW for what? If Peabody wins ... Good Season Fairley, Good win Peabody ... and vice versa. ????? I'm sorry if that offends you in any way but that's just how I roll. I've never been perfect in picking winners and I will probably get some more wrong in the future, but eating CROW is for people who talk smack to one another ... when have you read ANY post I've ever done where I talk smack to an opponent's fan base? For that matter, where in this thread ... ANYWHERE in this thread have I stated that Fairley will win? Go find it and post it. I'll save you the trouble ... you won't find it.

Edited by kwc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kwc said:

1) Look at the common opponents comparison I just posted.

2) Why on earth shouldn't I respond the way I've responded in the past in other threads? Eat CROW for what? If Peabody wins ... Good Season Fairley, Good win Peabody ... and vice versa. ????? I'm sorry if that offends you in any way but that's just how I roll. I've never been perfect in picking winners and I will probably get some more wrong in the future, but eating CROW is for people who talk smack to one another ... when have you read ANY post I've ever done where I talk smack to an opponent's fan base? For that matter, where in tyhis thread ... ANYWHERE in this thread have I stated the Fairley will win? Go find it and post it. I'll save you the trouble ... you won't find it.

Okay I have to agree with you on this post. Sorry man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, kwc said:

Fairley plays their home games at JP Freeman (4) which is grass. They also have played at Crump (1), MUS (1) and at Whitehaven (1) which are turf. They have also played at the Fairgrounds (1) which is also grass.  I don't know what surface they played on when they played Hernando nor do I rememnber the fields thay played on against A-ville and UC. Needless to say they have played on both surfaces throughpout the year.

I don’t guess it really matters. It just looked like in most of the videos they were playing on turf 

@kwc @BlackHavenSenator what do you guys think about the game ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Golddoctor said:

Okay I have to agree with you on this post. Sorry man

You are cool. I understand this is a big game and Fairley isn't a pushover. I'm rooting for Fairley myself, but I understand what they are up against as well. This should, for all intense and purposes, be a whale of a game. If it goes how I think ... it will be suspensfull until the end. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just saw UC and Fairley.  UC dominated the line of scrimmage early in the game.  Fairley was not 4 tds better than UC.  UC would hav played them much closer if not for some internal issues.  Also take away the kickoff return, but I can't do that, because that is good special teams play.  I will say, given some of those long runs UC had would have easily been homeruns for Peabody. Fairley is good.  But Peabody is better.  Two or three tds better

Edited by Golddoctor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peabody has scored  532 points. And has allowed 62 points for the year. 14 of those points werent allowed by the defense. They  were fumbles and  scoop and scores and a few were on the second team 

 

Fairley  has scored 400 and allowed 114 on defense  

@Golddoctor

@kwc

@BlackHavenSenator

 

Edited by Tide21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tide21 said:

Peabody has scored  532 points. And has allowed 62 points for the year. 14 of those points werent allowed by the defense. They  were fumbles and  scoop and scores and a few were on the second team 

 

Fairley  has scored 400 and allowed 114 on defense  

@Golddoctor

@kwc

@BlackHavenSenator

 

He had a good analogy but yours is more accurate.  Our defense has been lights out.  We are giving up about 5-6 points a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
    • No my fight, but ... if they were already college-caliber prior to transferring to BHS, and they already had FBS interest, and they end up at an FBS school, how did Bearden do anything for them?
×
  • Create New...