Jump to content

Summit gets Cleveland in Round 1


fooseball95
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

 

conso Finals Brentwood vs Summit 

 

#2 Posey is winning vs #1Yazdani

 

ref calls injury time after a potentially dangerous chicken wing. Posey says “no I’m good, let’s go”. Coach Miller calls the ref to the table and the ref says WORD FOR WORD “No he won’t argue with me that’s the match”. 
 

Yazdani wins by Inj Def. I don’t generally say this but that ref is out of line. I cannot state how bad that was. Inexcusable. Unbelievable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever “criteria” is stated to try to justify this ridiculous bracket is a waste of oxygen. It’s a cooked bracket designed to put Summit in the cons. Everyone who’s been around this stuff for a few years knows it’s true.

Anybody with half a brain knows that the #1 team goes at the top and the #2 team goes at the bottom and they usually meet in the finals. Total b******t!

Plain and simple.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/28/2024 at 3:59 PM, Wrestlingfan22 said:

Bottom line on all this is nobody wants to be on clevelands side of the bracket but if you wanna be the best you gotta beat the best and btw im not a cleveland fan 

I heard a quote the other day that I like.  “When people say seeding doesn’t matter then they either don’t understand seeding or they are the best team”. I am

sure Cleveland doesn’t care where they are seeded but I will promise you that every other team in the state cares. Seeding does matter!!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, GrapDon said:

Whatever “criteria” is stated to try to justify this ridiculous bracket is a waste of oxygen. It’s a cooked bracket designed to put Summit in the cons. Everyone who’s been around this stuff for a few years knows it’s true.

Anybody with half a brain knows that the #1 team goes at the top and the #2 team goes at the bottom and they usually meet in the finals. Total b******t!

Plain and simple.

So in your opinion who should have been the #2 seed? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, GrapDon said:

Whatever “criteria” is stated to try to justify this ridiculous bracket is a waste of oxygen. It’s a cooked bracket designed to put Summit in the cons. Everyone who’s been around this stuff for a few years knows it’s true.

Anybody with half a brain knows that the #1 team goes at the top and the #2 team goes at the bottom and they usually meet in the finals. Total b******t!

Plain and simple.

I am not saying that bracket was seeded well, but do you really think it was purposely seeded to put Summitt in the consolation bracket? If so, why? Also, it is interesting to note the three best teams (imo) did end up all wrestling each other.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FrecoFanatic said:

I am not saying that bracket was seeded well, but do you really think it was purposely seeded to put Summitt in the consolation bracket? If so, why? Also, it is interesting to note the three best teams (imo) did end up all wrestling each other.

Purposely? No. There’s no massive conspiracy to screw summit.

 

could it be sat down and seeded correctly? Yes. Was summit the clear #2? Of course 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Groves got the ball over 20+ times. His son arguably played the best for East in that game. 3rd and long multiple times and he came up big to continue a couple drives. Please shut up for the 3rd year in a row
    • And can you tell me who those two quarterbacks were, and every kid that was put into college from Bearden is a Bearden kid? It’s kind of why they graduated from Bearden.   and I would definitely not consider ETSU “waste”…
    • Most of this is complete gibberish. But the one part I could decipher is putting kids in college. This coaching staff hasn’t put a single Bearden kid in college. They completed wasted one of the best WRs in East TN and have ruined two talented QBs. All because they’re in over their heads. 
    • Well, I’d hope the new coaching staff thinks they are all that because they can always walk around the school, anytime they want, thinking that, especially for what they’ve done for the student athletes and the players, putting more kids in college in his first season than the old coaching staff did in numerous years combined, but we will just sweep over that because I know you don’t like facts. But trust me, nobody wanted Mr. Big britches, made the star player switch to quarterback, which is ultimately the reason he ended up transferring to play the position. He loved, but unfortunately, had to be at another school because Mr. Big Britches doesn’t like when a teenager knows more than him, but can’t expect much coming from a guy who used all class throwing pencils up into the ceiling and making fun of football kids who were failing class right to their face, and in front of numerous students, even projecting on the board most of the time.
    • After that first paragraph, I can see why you’re a TA and not a teacher. Have you made the move from South Knoxville to Bearden yet?    Maybe he left because he is an actual teacher and coach, and didn’t want to be associated with a group of foul mouthed middle school coaches who like to pretend they’re big time. 
×
  • Create New...