Maryville has not lost since 8/26/2010 (reg season)

[strongx]

Like Governors91 already said the players at Maryville dont have a major talent advantage but they do have a different CULTURE than most schools in ET. Everyone time they walk on the field they play like they know they are going to win. They are a COMPLETE TEAM! They dont make mistakes because they have been properly coached since they were 5 years old and already know the expectations to be a Rebel. Ive coached against them and have seen them play mutiple times.

OR2 may know better, but I think this upcoming senior class was not scored on when they were 5 years old. It was cool watching those little'uns run that spread offense.

[BarneySox2007]

Do you guys think Maryville could've rung off the state titles like they have the past 15 years in the old 3 class format? I think they probably would've still been right there. Not sure if they would've won as many though. Thoughts?

Don't think they would have during the 2000-2009 period but I think they would have all the titles from 2010-2014 that they played for. There were two or three times if not four that had it been 3 classes during the 2000-2009 period it would have been just to tough and one of those reasons would be because Maryville would have been in AAA and I'm not sure they could have played up to that especially in the early 2000's.

[STARSNBARS]

OR2 may know better, but I think this upcoming senior class was not scored on when they were 5 years old. It was cool watching those little'uns run that spread offense.

sx....When'st tham littull ones run thait "swangin' gait" hits a site two beholt....

[bluedevilpride2012]

Between that one and the 2009 team. 2009 team had better defense. 2010 was a little better offensively.

The 2009 team was great defensively. The Robinsons were great players. Offensively that team was limited in the passing game but Toney had the greatest year ever by a rusher TD wise in the state's history.

 

The 2010 team was good defensively but not nearly as dominant. Maryville, CAK, and Goodpasture put up some yards on them. Offensively you may never find a team that was as good as that one. They had a big time receiver in Isom. They had a great core of backs with a three headed monster of Hambrick, Warren, and Tyson. Tallent was a great leader at QB and Safety.

 

I personally don't think that the 2009 team could have kept up in a shootout with the 2010 team. The 2010 team was explosive offensively.

[BigDave1967]

[BigDave1967]

Here's a Maryville flashback,the Semifinal game against Oakland. Jack Jones was darn huge it'll be good to see him play at Tennessee

 

 

Edited June 23, 2015 by BigDave1967

[REBELRON]

Don't think they would have during the 2000-2009 period but I think they would have all the titles from 2010-2014 that they played for. There were two or three times if not four that had it been 3 classes during the 2000-2009 period it would have been just to tough and one of those reasons would be because Maryville would have been in AAA and I'm not sure they could have played up to that especially in the early 2000's.

 

 

In 2002,2005 and 2006 I would like Maryville's chances against anyone. 2002 team had injuries that would have devastated most teams. They lost Alex Rouse before the season started. Anyone that watched him in preseason saw how great he would have been. After the knee injury he was never the same. A lot of starters missed a lot of games. Against a very good Central team that year Maryville was missing 5 starters. Maryville still won.

[JSamson7]

I'm here to tell George Quarles and Maryville that there's a new sheriff in town- Phillip Shadowens

Hahahahahahaha! Ahahahahahahahaha! (sniffle-sniffle) Hahahahahahaha!

[rebelwoman87]

Here's a Maryville flashback,the Semifinal game against Oakland. Jack Jones was darn huge it'll be good to see him play at Tennessee

 

 

 

Jack Jones is huge, but Matt Young took care of business in this game.

[BigDave1967]

Jack Jones is huge, but Matt Young took care of business in this game.

 

He sure did