Jump to content

Waverly @ Riverside


rednecktiger31
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, sum1uno said:

Wet field could slow down Waverly to a point. I don’t think it will be enough but could be closer than most think especially with some costly turnovers. Waverly by 21

Waverly put up 77 last yr in the pouring rain. Now we all know waverly isnt going to score 77 but when a team has to play in a wet muddy field so does the other team. I see no advantage here for either just because of a wet field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, vandyfan1 said:

Waverly put up 77 last yr in the pouring rain. Now we all know waverly isnt going to score 77 but when a team has to play in a wet muddy field so does the other team. I see no advantage here for either just because of a wet field.

After reading this I reconsidered  my pick. I now say Waverly by 22 :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, vandyfan1 said:

Waverly put up 77 last yr in the pouring rain. Now we all know waverly isnt going to score 77 but when a team has to play in a wet muddy field so does the other team. I see no advantage here for either just because of a wet field.

Everyone comments about wet fields and the effect on a passing offense...I am a little different in my thinking than most, but I could see where a wet field would affect the defense more than the offense. Receivers know where they are going, and the DB's have to react to the routes run, not to mention the pass rush having poor footing. As long as the ball isn't muddy, a wet ball isn't much more difficult to catch than a dry one either. As Roy Dillard would say...if someone can keep McConnell's balls dry, it might help his boys beat that Frost mans team if it's muddy...you think im joking but im not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Never said I thought it was a smart decision. I'm scratching my head at it too.
    • If he wanted to play QB he should have either went to Heritage or William Blount and had a real good chance there. In stead he'll be exactly what he was going to be at Maryville. They already know who their QB is going to be in 2025 and it ain't going to be him.
    • Easier said than done. The man who ran for 250+ yards and 3TDs is gonna be back….and a lot bigger.
    • plus it removes the pressure around winning.
    • You are correct.   The teacher's pay scale is virtually the same in Knox County, now, as it is at Oak Ridge.   The coaching supplements are still higher at Oak Ridge, from what I was told, but not a huge difference.   Plus, Rusty is going from a position coach to an OC position, which is what he was at South Doyle and where his comfort zone is.  And from a special education teaching slot to a PE teaching slot.  There is a lot of positivity in that move without even considering the coaching aspect.   Anybody who sees something negative here is just looking for negativity to begin with.  But some live in that world.   Really good hire for Brent.  He now has two experienced and quality coordinators and can concentrate on being a head football coach.  
×
  • Create New...