Jump to content

RIVERSIDE @ HUNTINGDON


footballover
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 first half self- inflicted turnovers in the first half was brutal should have been up at the half losing your QB on the offensive line was a tough pill to swallow but we managed up to the half  every drive we had in the 2nd half was killed by stupid penalties and eventually They wore down our d-line in the 4th 

in summary them donkey’s just kicked us in the kitty

we will be better because of this don’t be surprised if we meet again 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, couchpotato said:

Huntingdon's offensive line was outplayed all night.  Granted they were outnumbered. 

Outnumbered big time. Riverside kept 11 guys within 8 yards of the line of scrimmage all night. Taking that into consideration I wouldn't say they were outplayed all night.  1st half for sure, they got dominated. 6-7 Huntingdon players on the ground while 5 Riverside defenders were on top of the ball carrier 3-4 yards in the backfield.

The 2nd half was a bit of a different story, though. I saw that O Line pulling, creating gaps, and pushing RHS downhill.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, couchpotato said:

That was the closest 33-7 ballgame I believe I have ever seen.

Riverside did everything they could to give the game away and did a very good job of it.  Huntingdon was outplayed most of the night but took advantage every time it counted.

At the end of the game, Riverside was gassed and Huntingdon had some quick scoring strikes.

I guess I was watching a different game. So you can say Riverside was gassed at the end of the game but OUTPLAYED Huntingdon? There were panthers after every single play on their backs. Riverside has some tough running backs and hit hard, but they did not outplay the Mustangs in a 33-7 loss.

I thought the TD getting called back was going to be a the turning point in the game, but Huntingdon kept it together. It seemed like Riverside was out of sorts and had trouble getting the right players in later in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Waker said:

I guess I was watching a different game. So you can say Riverside was gassed at the end of the game but OUTPLAYED Huntingdon? There were panthers after every single play on their backs. Riverside has some tough running backs and hit hard, but they did not outplay the Mustangs in a 33-7 loss.

I thought the TD getting called back was going to be a the turning point in the game, but Huntingdon kept it together. It seemed like Riverside was out of sorts and had trouble getting the right players in later in the game.

Completely agree. After the first drive Huntingdon was pretty much in control the whole game. Riverside’s coaches definitely panicked once they were behind and abandoned their original game plan. Cocky and undisciplined teams tend to make mistakes when everything doesn’t go as planned and i think we saw that tonight

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, MustangNation007 said:

The difference from Huntingdon and 90% of the schools in west Tennessee is that our down years are better than most school’s best years. No different this year

Huntingdon’s best years are still not getting the gold balls they should have in trophy case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can assure RIVERSIDE, they don't beat up on teams like we do over here.  For example, they ( Riverside ) have not played a team like McKenzie, ( like Huntingdon has). Riverside has also not played a U S J or Lake County like team ( Like Union City Has ). Riverside would finish 3rd or 4th in our region this year and yes I said that and most over here would agree.

Edited by Tornadopride
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tornadopride said:

I can assure RIVERSIDE, they don't beat up on teams like we do over here.  For example, they ( Riverside ) have not played a team like McKenzie, ( like Huntingdon has). Riverside has also not played a U S J or Lake County like team ( Like Union City Has ). Riverside would finish 3rd or 4th in our region this year and yes I said that andany would agree.

Lake county?? Lol. Riverside would beat them by 30+. After tonight i think they would finish second behind us

Edited by MustangNation007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tornadopride said:

I can assure RIVERSIDE, they don't beat up on teams like we do over here.  For example, they ( Riverside ) have not played a team like McKenzie, ( like Huntingdon has). Riverside has also not played a U S J or Lake County like team ( Like Union City Has ). Riverside would finish 3rd or 4th in our region this year and yes I said that and most over here would agree.

I’m just here to tell you, no one cares about Union City when it comes to this ballgame. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...