Jump to content

Summit gets Cleveland in Round 1


fooseball95
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

 

conso Finals Brentwood vs Summit 

 

#2 Posey is winning vs #1Yazdani

 

ref calls injury time after a potentially dangerous chicken wing. Posey says “no I’m good, let’s go”. Coach Miller calls the ref to the table and the ref says WORD FOR WORD “No he won’t argue with me that’s the match”. 
 

Yazdani wins by Inj Def. I don’t generally say this but that ref is out of line. I cannot state how bad that was. Inexcusable. Unbelievable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever “criteria” is stated to try to justify this ridiculous bracket is a waste of oxygen. It’s a cooked bracket designed to put Summit in the cons. Everyone who’s been around this stuff for a few years knows it’s true.

Anybody with half a brain knows that the #1 team goes at the top and the #2 team goes at the bottom and they usually meet in the finals. Total b******t!

Plain and simple.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/28/2024 at 3:59 PM, Wrestlingfan22 said:

Bottom line on all this is nobody wants to be on clevelands side of the bracket but if you wanna be the best you gotta beat the best and btw im not a cleveland fan 

I heard a quote the other day that I like.  “When people say seeding doesn’t matter then they either don’t understand seeding or they are the best team”. I am

sure Cleveland doesn’t care where they are seeded but I will promise you that every other team in the state cares. Seeding does matter!!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, GrapDon said:

Whatever “criteria” is stated to try to justify this ridiculous bracket is a waste of oxygen. It’s a cooked bracket designed to put Summit in the cons. Everyone who’s been around this stuff for a few years knows it’s true.

Anybody with half a brain knows that the #1 team goes at the top and the #2 team goes at the bottom and they usually meet in the finals. Total b******t!

Plain and simple.

So in your opinion who should have been the #2 seed? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, GrapDon said:

Whatever “criteria” is stated to try to justify this ridiculous bracket is a waste of oxygen. It’s a cooked bracket designed to put Summit in the cons. Everyone who’s been around this stuff for a few years knows it’s true.

Anybody with half a brain knows that the #1 team goes at the top and the #2 team goes at the bottom and they usually meet in the finals. Total b******t!

Plain and simple.

I am not saying that bracket was seeded well, but do you really think it was purposely seeded to put Summitt in the consolation bracket? If so, why? Also, it is interesting to note the three best teams (imo) did end up all wrestling each other.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FrecoFanatic said:

I am not saying that bracket was seeded well, but do you really think it was purposely seeded to put Summitt in the consolation bracket? If so, why? Also, it is interesting to note the three best teams (imo) did end up all wrestling each other.

Purposely? No. There’s no massive conspiracy to screw summit.

 

could it be sat down and seeded correctly? Yes. Was summit the clear #2? Of course 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


×
  • Create New...