Jump to content

TSSAA proposals on classification


Indian
 Share

Recommended Posts

Proposal B is a nice compromise. I still think there would be some teams with losing records in the playoffs however. A 2A school that plays in a region with a bunch of 3A's might finish below 500 and still be in the top 2 2A schools in their region. I think that FB will then be in the same districts that are set for Basketball and Baseball which keeps the rivalries the same.

 

Example for 11AA:

 

Sycamore- AAA

Creekwood- AAA

Montgomery Central- AAA

Cheatham- AAA

Harpeth- AA

Fairview- AA

Waverly- AA

Stewart County- AA

 

There's still 4 teams per region going to the playoffs. The natural rivalry games are being played and mean something. Travel for football is the same as for every other sport. Currently the 3 Cheatham County schools are in 3 separate regions for football while they are in the same district for basketball and baseball which makes zero sense. They are going to schedule each other in football most years anyway. Three class groupings for regular season will save money and THAT'S why TSSAA will do it. They've struggled with the 5 class system since it's inception. Dividing public and private only made more problems.

 

 

I think you have a misconception, or maybe I do. But, from the people that I have spoken with & from what I read on TSSAA, it isnt (to use your example) the top two 3A teams & the top two 2A teams going. It is the top 2 teams period. That will give them 32 teams that will be divided by enrollment into two classes. Then they will pick 32 wild card teams that will be divided by enrollment to fit into the remaining slots.

 

I may be a little off on the bracketing, but I know that it does not say anywhere that they would take the top two 3A schools & then the top two 2A schools. Nor does it say that there has to be 4 teams from each region, only the #1 & #2 teams are guarenteed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What I read was 16 districts x 2 teams for 32 teams each classification. I took that to mean 32 for 2A and 32 for 3A.

 

Ok, I re read the thing on TSSAA's website. It's a little confusing as to how it will work.

 

1. The top 2 teams from 16 districts are automatics. The top 16 of those 32 by enrollment go into the higher class. The remaining go into the lower class.

 

2. The remaining 16 teams in each division are wild cards.

 

Q: Is the enrollment known before the season ends? It seems to me that it's not if they break the automatics evenly into 16 upper and 16 lower. Do the middle two teams set the enrollment figures for that playoff year? What about the teams in between them enrollment wise?

 

Q: What sets the enrollment figures for the wildcards? Do you take the dividing line assigned for the upper/lower and pick the 16 wildcards for each division based on enrollment, region finish and record? It seems you'd have to. If that's the case some teams could be 2A one year and 3A the next depending on how teams fare in comparision to their enrollment.

 

If this is the case, then the lower class gets screwed. Logically there should be more 3A schools that would do well in a 2A/3A region and so more historically 3A schools would get the automatics. The 3A's with the lower enrollment figures would then move to 2A for the playoffs eliminating 2A schools from wildcard consideration. If a team paid attention, they could possibly find themselves in a situation where if they win a regular season game they're in the 3A playoffs and if they lose they'd be in 2A. Meanwhile, the 2A teams have to win every game they can for a prayer at getting in. It would be Monday before the brackets were all figured out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a mess, this is confusing. I wonder if plan C with a little tweaking would be better? I like everything except schools with 900 students playing schools with 100, there's nothing fair about that. I kinda see where TSSAA came up with the Rural/Urban thing, all you have to do is look at the list of teams in AAA. There are several (not all) teams in that classification that have either won or played in championship games, or go deep into the playoffs on a regular basis. What if they just bumped them up one classification and kept the 5 classification format. Sounds stupid? maybe, Just throwing it out there for discussion, not to insult anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked the rural/urban split too except for cases like NCS which I'm familiar with. They would be thrown to the wolves in an urban schedule. If they did rural/urban, you'd have to allow for some exceptions. It wouldn't do much for the travel situation for the rural teams, but they typically have always had to travel more anyway.

 

 

The trouble with proposal B is going to be making it equitable for everyone. There will be regions with more 3A teams than 2A and vice versa. I do like the top 2 teams from each region getting in, I just don't think you can divide those evenly into 3A and 2A classes at playoff time. To me, if the dividing line is figured out by enrollment before the season starts, everybody knows where they stand. If there's 22 3A schools and 10 2A schools in the top 32 spots by region finish, then you have to find 10 3A wildcards and 22 2A wildcards come playoff time according to the published enrollments at classification. How hard is that?

 

I don't think it has to be so complicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I read was 16 districts x 2 teams for 32 teams each classification. I took that to mean 32 for 2A and 32 for 3A.

 

Ok, I re read the thing on TSSAA's website. It's a little confusing as to how it will work.

 

1. The top 2 teams from 16 districts are automatics. The top 16 of those 32 by enrollment go into the higher class. The remaining go into the lower class.

 

2. The remaining 16 teams in each division are wild cards.

 

Q: Is the enrollment known before the season ends? It seems to me that it's not if they break the automatics evenly into 16 upper and 16 lower. Do the middle two teams set the enrollment figures for that playoff year? What about the teams in between them enrollment wise?

 

Q: What sets the enrollment figures for the wildcards? Do you take the dividing line assigned for the upper/lower and pick the 16 wildcards for each division based on enrollment, region finish and record? It seems you'd have to. If that's the case some teams could be 2A one year and 3A the next depending on how teams fare in comparision to their enrollment.

 

If this is the case, then the lower class gets screwed. Logically there should be more 3A schools that would do well in a 2A/3A region and so more historically 3A schools would get the automatics. The 3A's with the lower enrollment figures would then move to 2A for the playoffs eliminating 2A schools from wildcard consideration. If a team paid attention, they could possibly find themselves in a situation where if they win a regular season game they're in the 3A playoffs and if they lose they'd be in 2A. Meanwhile, the 2A teams have to win every game they can for a prayer at getting in. It would be Monday before the brackets were all figured out.

 

 

I don't think you are on the right track. Enrollment figures will be used as always to place teams in class AA. Class AA will be divided for the playoffs into 2a and 3a. There will be 16 districts with only 2 teams each automatically qualifying for the playoffs. Those 32 teams will be placed 1st by their enrollments. 3a schools will be placed in the 3a playoffs...2a teams will be placed in the 2a playoffs. That could be 24 teams or it could be 12 teams. When you are finished placing those teams...the remaining teams in each class will be placed by wildcard. Teams will not go from one class to another based on wins or losses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes more sense Antwan. I hope that's how it works out.

 

The proposal doesn't read that well. Here's the exact verbage:

 

"In football (Class AAA), the top two teams from each district (16 districts) would qualify for the playoffs for a total of 32 teams. The upper half (by enrollment) of the schools in AAA would be 5A and the lower half would be 4A. The 32 teams finishing 1st and 2nd in each of the 16 districts would be placed in 4A and 5A. The remaining spots in each (4A&5A) would be filled with wild cards. There would be 32 teams in 5A and 32 teams in 4A for a total of 64 in Class AAA. The playoff brackets would then be set."

 

Having the upper half/lower half comment after the top 2 in 16 districts will qualify for the playoffs statement makes this confusing. It can be interpreted to mean that the enrollment figures for the 32 that are automatically in the playoffs set the classifications.

 

A more concise way of saying it would be:

 

"In football (Class AAA), the upper half (by enrollment) of the schools in AAA would be in 5A and the lower half would be in 4A. The top 2 teams from each district (16 districts) would qualify for the playoffs for a total of 32 teams. These teams will be placed in the playoff bracket of their respective classes (by enrollment). The remaining spots in each (4A&5A) would be filled with wild cards. There would be 32 teams in 5A and 32 teams in 4A for a total of 64 in Class AAA. The playoff brackets would then be set."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes more sense Antwan. I hope that's how it works out.

 

The proposal doesn't read that well. Here's the exact verbage:

 

"In football (Class AAA), the top two teams from each district (16 districts) would qualify for the playoffs for a total of 32 teams. The upper half (by enrollment) of the schools in AAA would be 5A and the lower half would be 4A. The 32 teams finishing 1st and 2nd in each of the 16 districts would be placed in 4A and 5A. The remaining spots in each (4A&5A) would be filled with wild cards. There would be 32 teams in 5A and 32 teams in 4A for a total of 64 in Class AAA. The playoff brackets would then be set."

 

Having the upper half/lower half comment after the top 2 in 16 districts will qualify for the playoffs statement makes this confusing. It can be interpreted to mean that the enrollment figures for the 32 that are automatically in the playoffs set the classifications.

 

A more concise way of saying it would be:

 

"In football (Class AAA), the upper half (by enrollment) of the schools in AAA would be in 5A and the lower half would be in 4A. The top 2 teams from each district (16 districts) would qualify for the playoffs for a total of 32 teams. These teams will be placed in the playoff bracket of their respective classes (by enrollment). The remaining spots in each (4A&5A) would be filled with wild cards. There would be 32 teams in 5A and 32 teams in 4A for a total of 64 in Class AAA. The playoff brackets would then be set."

 

 

Yes...and I do think that is the way it will be if it indeed does happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do we have to have so many teams in the playoffs? Is it just about $$ for the TSSAA and the schools that consistently go deep in the playoffs?

 

Now I know I'm old, but in my day you had to win your district (we didn't call them regions) out right to get in.

If records were tied, then head to head decided who went.

 

My senior year we went 8-2 and didn't make it to the playoffs.

 

I'd like to see Bowl Games come back for those teams with good records who don't make it to the playoffs, but that will never happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not just put publics and privates back together?

 

Have 4 classifications.

 

Apply Multipliers for specific conditions:

 

X2 for open enrollment public schools and private schools

 

Another X2 for private schools offering financial aid

 

Do the math on every school and then list them top to bottom and break into 4 classifications and then

into districts

 

Done...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • I've always been a football fan first and then if you have a band that's awesome.No question that DB has one of the best bands in the country and the whole region should attend at least one DB game just to see their band. I don't know if Nick Saban could come to Kingsport and build a football program that could match the Dobyns Bennett band's success.That said,as mentioned before, a couple of things would have to change in order for the Tribe to just win a state championship on the field.Besides a program that starts from the peewee teams and goes all the way to J Fred with all coaches and weight training { in time }on the same page. Sometimes it also takes a little luck like the 1998 Vols .There are a lot of great athletes at a lot of big schools around the state and just because you want something doesn't mean your going to build a program like Alcoa has. Yes,start at the bottom and have guys that are quality coaches teaching at every level is 100% the first step. Parents can make it a lot easier by getting their young athletes into an early start with conditioning and weights as well when they are old enough to lift.If your son is a man in the weight room before he gets to DB , then it won't take a "Dobbs" coach to make him competitive against other schools athletes when it comes to strength.
    • Dyersburg scrimmaged South Gibson last week
    • A complete cultural change happened at Greeneville and the administration and community opened up their checkbooks.  What a lot of people don't know is Ballard was Zeller's OC for many years and stopped coaching for two years because Zeller and Ballard didn't see eye to eye on some things.  Zeller lead Greeneville to it's first ever Semi Final appearance in 2000 and lost 28-12 at Maryville and had them in the Quarter Finals in 2002 and 2003.  Z was a great coach but lost some control when it came to making workouts mandatory. (He learned from that Mistake and it was at LC when i coached with him.).  Z was let go going into my Senior Year and was replaced by Steve McCurry who was the one that turned the program around.  Steve had won a 4a state championship at AC Reynolds in Asheville and made the administration completely redo the weight room with new equipment, had a football period at the end of the school day to lift, started devil camp, and brought in coaches like Danny Bentley (Still the OL coach), Ballard as the OC, Cody Baugh (QB coach and still there), and even Spradlen who is Greeneville's head coach now as the DB's Coach.  McCurry only coached for two seasons at Greeneville and took a team that had a losing record the year before and finished my Senior Year making it to the Quarters and having a 10-3 record and then followed it up with a Semi Final appearance the next year with an 11-3 record and back to back conference championships.  Loved McCurry to death but the recession hit and the story i heard was he was still buying new equipment for the team that the Principal didn't authorize and his response was "I don't answer to you and only to Niswonger and Bewley" (Two huge donors).  That was it for him and they Promoted Ballard shortly after that.   Greeneville had always been relevant ever since the the late 70's under Coach Fred Sorrell's.  Since Sorrell's took over in 1977 Greeneville overall winning percentage is over 76%.  The biggest reason people might not have thought Greeneville was "Good" until Ballard was Greeneville always played up Classification wise and could never get over the hump. (When there were 3 classifications we played 3a, when it went to 5 we played 4a).  Greeneville is the largest its ever been with 953 students and where playing teams 2 or 3 times there size back in the day (I had a little over 800 kids in the school when i graduated in 2008).  Other teams always would know they would be sore after a game but depth took over and never won a Championship until Greeneville played in the classification the TSSAA actually assigned them. You had names like Dustin Moore (1993 Mr Football for 3a and who Phillip Fulmer said was one of the greatest athletes he ever recruited), James "Mud Turtle" Mayes, Brigham Lyons, Byron Gillespie, Frankie Debusk (National Champion Qb at Furman with GQ), Jasmine Lowery, Cody Baugh, The Greenway Brothers, Joe Watson (Furman), etc.  Now the cultural is from the Pee Wee league up and you grow up as a young kid wanting to wear the Greene and White.  Here is a really good link when it comes to anything Greeneville Football related. https://greenevillefootball.com/   I also don't coach anymore.  Z told me i was to smart with how the school systems are ran these days and ended up going into real estate in Knoxville which has been a great decision for my life.
    • Yes, they will. I'm wondering what kinds of strides Sale Creek will make heading into the second season under Coach Fitz.
    • No yellow stripes on the rug last night. Biggest crowd I’ve seen at 825 since the alco debacle. 
×
  • Create New...