Jump to content

Metro Rankings


bleacher

Recommended Posts

On 11/1/2017 at 8:23 AM, cbg said:

Sorry to hurt your feelings but I was a MNPS graduate many years ago when the system was good.  It truly is a joke today.  I tell people every day that if you cannot attend Hume Fogg or MLK, get the heck out of Davidson County and don't look back.  Unfortunately in the past (30+ years ago) all students in MNPS had the opportunity to receive the same type of education as those students at HF and MLK do today.  It's a sad state of affairs when families are forced to move out of Davidson County due to safety issues in many of the MNPS.

Feelings aren’t hurt at all. As for me, I never attended a public school my whole life, through postdoc. I just tire of generalizations. For example, last time I checked, I do not recall any Metro students being anally raped as alleged in one private school in Williamson County. Years back, I personally witnessed drugs being sold out of a football locker room at a prominent private school in Williamson County. It was swept under the rug. 

I agree changes need to be made to MNPS, in the area of discopline and the “politicking” that gies on behind closed doors in academics and athletics.

i personally feel certain population influx will demand better schools but it may not translate to an improved athletic program for MNPS. If families move out of Davidson County, it is not for safety issues. They simply cannot afford the price tag for a quality private school and they are going for a bargain Williamson County public school.

Edited by burrodaddy
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, burrodaddy said:

Feelings aren’t hurt at all. As for me, I never attended a public school my whole life, through postdoc. I just tire of generalizations. For example, last time I checked, I do not recall any Metro students being anally raped as alleged in one private school in Williamson County. Years back, I personally witnessed drugs being sold out of a football locker room at a prominent private school in Williamson County. It was swept under the rug. 

I agree changes need to be made to MNPS, in the area of discopline and the “politicking” that gies on behind closed doors in academics and athletics.

i personally feel certain population influx will demand better schools but it may not translate to an improved athletic program for MNPS. If families move out of Davidson County, it is not for safety issues. They simply cannot afford the price tag for a quality private school and they are going for a bargain Williamson County public school.

You sound like my sister. She went to a private here and was saying some of the same things. A kid who was kicked out for rape but got to walk with his class  graduation. A athlete who brung a gun to school and wasn't kicked out and drugs bring sold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, runtheball said:

I recently heard that metro is considering doing away with football in some schools and allowing players to play at other schools. 

Actually, I think that might be a possible solution. If a kid wants to play he should have an opportunity to play, even though he may not be as talented as the stud who can pick where he wants to go. Maybe Metro needs to consolidate down to a number of regional teams with strict zoning req.s to prevent poaching by some other Metros. 

More radical, some states have total opening zoning - you can play at any school (public) in the district. Of course, recruiting becomes the obvious problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

6 hours ago, burrodaddy said:

Actually, I think that might be a possible solution. If a kid wants to play he should have an opportunity to play, even though he may not be as talented as the stud who can pick where he wants to go. Maybe Metro needs to consolidate down to a number of regional teams with strict zoning req.s to prevent poaching by some other Metros. 

More radical, some states have total opening zoning - you can play at any school (public) in the district. Of course, recruiting becomes the obvious problem. 

Slightly tangential to the points raised in the quote above,  where does RePublic High School fit into the mix?  Technically, they are a public high school. If they begin to get any success on the field (which shouldn't take long in the weak region they are currently in) I can see them possibly attracting a ton of good players from their area of Nashville: Hunters Lane, Maplewood, and Whites Creek.  RePublic is within a three miles radius of all three schools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, burrodaddy said:

Actually, I think that might be a possible solution. If a kid wants to play he should have an opportunity to play, even though he may not be as talented as the stud who can pick where he wants to go. Maybe Metro needs to consolidate down to a number of regional teams with strict zoning req.s to prevent poaching by some other Metros. 

More radical, some states have total opening zoning - you can play at any school (public) in the district. Of course, recruiting becomes the obvious problem. 

Recruiting is already happening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, runtheball said:

I recently heard that metro is considering doing away with football in some schools and allowing players to play at other schools. 

I know that MLK co-op with Pearl-Cohn in football.  If several other Metro schools try this approach you'd best believe there will be an outcry of schools wanting those co-op school totals counting against enrollment numbers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, howdoitknow said:

I know that MLK co-op with Pearl-Cohn in football.  If several other Metro schools try this approach you'd best believe there will be an outcry of schools wanting those co-op school totals counting against enrollment numbers.  

As I believe they should. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, howdoitknow said:

I know that MLK co-op with Pearl-Cohn in football.  If several other Metro schools try this approach you'd best believe there will be an outcry of schools wanting those co-op school totals counting against enrollment numbers.  

Why should those enrollment numbers not count?  If two schools co-op for athletics the enrollment numbers from both schools should be combined and the total should be used for TSSAA classification purposes.  The enrollment numbers from both MLK & Pearl Cohn should be combined for football classification within the TSSAA. 

Another issue is that the TSSAA should allow schools to play up in classification in some sports and where the enrollment numbers dictate for other sports.  Example; if a Class A school is great in basketball but only average in baseball they should be allowed to play in the highest classification in basketball if requested but where the enrollment numbers fall out in baseball.  

Edited by cbg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...