Jump to content

2021 Single A Discussion


Rockstar89
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Itsme12 said:

I've seen teams at state that wouldn't finish top 4 in many districts in middle TN.  It really is a shame.  I think there should be more movement once regions hit and especially during the substate rounds.  There are teams sitting at home that could contend for a state title but just happen to run into a big time team.  It really is sad for those girls

Yeah it’s really frustrating. Something needs to change. In single A Region 5 & 6 which will only send 2 teams to state you have: Summertown, Loretto, Hickman County, Harpeth & Camden. All top ten in the state and not counting Jo Byrns who could probably win several other regions themselves. So 3-4 top ten teams won’t even get to compete at state while teams that play no competition all season and have gone to state multiple times to never even win a set, or barely even score in double digits in a set against state level competition, get multiple chances year after year because of poor/lazy structuring. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's hard to do this well when you only look at one sport.  It's always going to be geographical obviously.  The only real solution woudl be expanding the teams that qualify for Region, which I am against. I don't love it when a state champion can lose in the district and region and still be a state champ.   In Division 2 they allow top 4 teams to make the region, but it's a much smaller division.  Watching single A teams play at the state tournament is difficult to sit through sometimes.   There are some really good individial players in single A, just not very many good teams.     There are certainly a few expections. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, clifford20 said:

it's hard to do this well when you only look at one sport.  It's always going to be geographical obviously.  The only real solution woudl be expanding the teams that qualify for Region, which I am against. I don't love it when a state champion can lose in the district and region and still be a state champ.   In Division 2 they allow top 4 teams to make the region, but it's a much smaller division.  Watching single A teams play at the state tournament is difficult to sit through sometimes.   There are some really good individial players in single A, just not very many good teams.     There are certainly a few expections. 

You are correct, the single A teams aren't as good as the higher divisions, that's a given - they won't be...but they really won't be when several of the better ones are sitting at home! LOL  

I don't mind the scenario you brought up and actually the reason you give for NOT liking it is a good argument for why it SHOULD be done in my opinion. Make it a gauntlet of the BEST teams not just who geographically makes it. The teams I mentioned earlier have all played each other all season and taken turns beating each other for the most part. Its hard to beat someone multiple times. If those are the best teams, they should be playing regardless. Of course, my opinion only. And as the old adage goes, if you want something...go out and get it. You gotta win what they put in front of you. Its a moot point at this juncture. Just like to see some rational change for the future. 

Edited by Rockstar89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Rockstar89 said:

You are correct, the single A teams aren't as good as the higher divisions, that's a given - they won't be...but they really won't be when several of the better ones are sitting at home! LOL  

I don't mind the scenario you brought up and actually the reason you give for NOT liking it is a good argument for why it SHOULD be done in my opinion. Make it a gauntlet of the BEST teams not just who geographically makes it. The teams I mentioned earlier have all played each other all season and taken turns beating each other for the most part. Its hard to beat someone multiple times. If those are the best teams, they should be playing regardless. Of course, my opinion only. And as the old adage goes, if you want something...go out and get it. You gotta win what they put in front of you. Its a moot point at this juncture. Just like to see some rational change for the future. 

It's certainly a good debate.  it does take away the team that get's hot and wins 3-4 games and makes it to the state championship.  But it also ensures that the best teams make it.    I cannot recall a time though that a team that places 3rd or 4th in a good district that made a run to the championship (in the small class).  I am sure it's happened, but I can't recall it.  Usually the team that finishes at the top ends up running it.   I am really hoping to see a good AAA tournament this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jaychapman said:

Getting that time to buckle down / hope no injuries no virus raises it ugly head and gyms are full - all the teams have worked hard ( win or lose ) and sacrificed many school activities to represent that school - some people consider it a secondary sport but these kids don’t 

This is a very good post. I've tried to comment in order to add something, but I give up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/29/2021 at 10:34 PM, Jaychapman said:

Do as Alabama does only send 4 to state - would eliminate weak teams and PROBABLY only have top teams left 

I think a better option would be to use take the top 3 or 4 from district, then create a "travel ball like format" where you play a tournament over a weekend and seed from all over the state using a unapproved website ranking (not saying it's perfect but it's better than the current format for rankings) and seed 1 vs lowest seed (whatever the number comes out to).  The top 16 from the tournaments go to state.

You will see some districts dominate but a true state champion will be determined.  There should also be more than 3 divisions.  The top 3A school is almost double the lowest 3A school in size.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Itsme12 said:

I think a better option would be to use take the top 3 or 4 from district, then create a "travel ball like format" where you play a tournament over a weekend and seed from all over the state using a unapproved website ranking (not saying it's perfect but it's better than the current format for rankings) and seed 1 vs lowest seed (whatever the number comes out to).  The top 16 from the tournaments go to state.

You will see some districts dominate but a true state champion will be determined.  There should also be more than 3 divisions.  The top 3A school is almost double the lowest 3A school in size.

Something like this certainly sounds better. Or somehow add to the number of teams going to sectionals/substate. Maybe have a few 'at large' picks like they have in March Madness. Once all Regions are completed if there are a couple of teams that didn't win Region, but they have impressed enough/have credentials/pedigree...they get seeded and get a chance to continue. Like in 3A, you can't tell me you have the best of the best playing at State when either Nolensville or Brentwood is going to sit at home. It's just silly. Something has to change.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Rockstar89 said:

Something like this certainly sounds better. Or somehow add to the number of teams going to sectionals/substate. Maybe have a few 'at large' picks like they have in March Madness. Once all Regions are completed if there are a couple of teams that didn't win Region, but they have impressed enough/have credentials/pedigree...they get seeded and get a chance to continue. Like in 3A, you can't tell me you have the best of the best playing at State when either Nolensville or Brentwood is going to sit at home. It's just silly. Something has to change.

At large is a terrible idea. Can you imagine?  Let’s say the best team loses but they get to move on anyway?  Then they End up playing the same team again and beating them…would be awful.   Again I’ve never seen a 3rd place team good enough to go win the state, but this year could be it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • Recent Posts

    • Pirates can make a run at the dance for sure.
    • I've always been a football fan first and then if you have a band that's awesome.No question that DB has one of the best bands in the country and the whole region should attend at least one DB game just to see their band. I don't know if Nick Saban could come to Kingsport and build a football program that could match the Dobyns Bennett band's success.That said,as mentioned before, a couple of things would have to change in order for the Tribe to just win a state championship on the field.Besides a program that starts from the peewee teams and goes all the way to J Fred with all coaches and weight training { in time }on the same page. Sometimes it also takes a little luck like the 1998 Vols .There are a lot of great athletes at a lot of big schools around the state and just because you want something doesn't mean your going to build a program like Alcoa has. Yes,start at the bottom and have guys that are quality coaches teaching at every level is 100% the first step. Parents can make it a lot easier by getting their young athletes into an early start with conditioning and weights as well when they are old enough to lift.If your son is a man in the weight room before he gets to DB , then it won't take a "Dobbs" coach to make him competitive against other schools athletes when it comes to strength.
    • Dyersburg scrimmaged South Gibson last week
    • A complete cultural change happened at Greeneville and the administration and community opened up their checkbooks.  What a lot of people don't know is Ballard was Zeller's OC for many years and stopped coaching for two years because Zeller and Ballard didn't see eye to eye on some things.  Zeller lead Greeneville to it's first ever Semi Final appearance in 2000 and lost 28-12 at Maryville and had them in the Quarter Finals in 2002 and 2003.  Z was a great coach but lost some control when it came to making workouts mandatory. (He learned from that Mistake and it was at LC when i coached with him.).  Z was let go going into my Senior Year and was replaced by Steve McCurry who was the one that turned the program around.  Steve had won a 4a state championship at AC Reynolds in Asheville and made the administration completely redo the weight room with new equipment, had a football period at the end of the school day to lift, started devil camp, and brought in coaches like Danny Bentley (Still the OL coach), Ballard as the OC, Cody Baugh (QB coach and still there), and even Spradlen who is Greeneville's head coach now as the DB's Coach.  McCurry only coached for two seasons at Greeneville and took a team that had a losing record the year before and finished my Senior Year making it to the Quarters and having a 10-3 record and then followed it up with a Semi Final appearance the next year with an 11-3 record and back to back conference championships.  Loved McCurry to death but the recession hit and the story i heard was he was still buying new equipment for the team that the Principal didn't authorize and his response was "I don't answer to you and only to Niswonger and Bewley" (Two huge donors).  That was it for him and they Promoted Ballard shortly after that.   Greeneville had always been relevant ever since the the late 70's under Coach Fred Sorrell's.  Since Sorrell's took over in 1977 Greeneville overall winning percentage is over 76%.  The biggest reason people might not have thought Greeneville was "Good" until Ballard was Greeneville always played up Classification wise and could never get over the hump. (When there were 3 classifications we played 3a, when it went to 5 we played 4a).  Greeneville is the largest its ever been with 953 students and where playing teams 2 or 3 times there size back in the day (I had a little over 800 kids in the school when i graduated in 2008).  Other teams always would know they would be sore after a game but depth took over and never won a Championship until Greeneville played in the classification the TSSAA actually assigned them. You had names like Dustin Moore (1993 Mr Football for 3a and who Phillip Fulmer said was one of the greatest athletes he ever recruited), James "Mud Turtle" Mayes, Brigham Lyons, Byron Gillespie, Frankie Debusk (National Champion Qb at Furman with GQ), Jasmine Lowery, Cody Baugh, The Greenway Brothers, Joe Watson (Furman), etc.  Now the cultural is from the Pee Wee league up and you grow up as a young kid wanting to wear the Greene and White.  Here is a really good link when it comes to anything Greeneville Football related. https://greenevillefootball.com/   I also don't coach anymore.  Z told me i was to smart with how the school systems are ran these days and ended up going into real estate in Knoxville which has been a great decision for my life.
    • Yes, they will. I'm wondering what kinds of strides Sale Creek will make heading into the second season under Coach Fitz.
×
  • Create New...