Jump to content

South Pittsburg vs McKenzie (stone man and little grider man against this comer man)


Roy Dillard

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, TheSkipBayless said:

I got to take Mckenzie in this one they beat the two defending state champs to get here and both of those games were dog fights. They are def battle tested.  I think South Pitt has been phenomenal dealing with what they have been through this season having their coach quit on them. I think they have the speed to keep up with Mckenzie but they wont be physically capable of hanging around. If you want the recipe to stopping Mckenzie or Slowing them down then turn the Fayetteville tape on but South Pitt doesnt have those type of kids. Mckenzie really well coach they wont beat themselves. Mckenzie by 3 1/2 scores give me #11 for MVP. 

I'll take 2 SP's DT's over Fayteville's or McKenzie's any day of the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, rlh said:

1st, my response was to a Lake County poster.  Secondly, you ignored the point I made about classifications.  Lastly, Pirates don't roll over either.  They lost last year throwing into the end zone on the last play of the game and lost to UC the 1st time by a field goal with about 3 seconds on the clock.  This stuff about the Pirates getting blown out is the real B.S. because it hasn't happened since 1974 when Brentwood Academy did it.  The last time SP played McK you all were moving up and this time y'all moved down.  This Pirate bunch may get clobbered Friday, but they aren't afraid of playing anyone in Tennessee.

Note - Oakland, pretty much sums up rlh last sentence. Probably biggest loss (rlh will know) since the BA game long ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, powerp said:

Poor Pirates.Just no chance for SP in this one. Is this the first title game where they have been this big of an underdog?

I can't think of another title game where they were bigger underdogs. Sp O-line will need to have the best game of their lives to give us a shot in this one.  Mckenzie would probably be representing the west in 2a and possibly 3a this year. They are very good at every position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TheSkipBayless said:

The Davis kid is legit thats facts but you can scheme around him. South Pitts LB's, and Dbs better come ready and stay sound 

Then you have #57 running loose on you. Davis was out most of the season. 57 had to take up the slack during that time along with others on the D-Line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, CougarDadx2 said:

Note - Oakland, pretty much sums up rlh last sentence. Probably biggest loss (rlh will know) since the BA game long ago.

Oakland wasn't a state title game.  We got hammered by Cloudland in the 2001 semifinal game up there and by Gordy in the 1st round in 2006. That said, these guys calling for a blowout must think they can hang around with Oakland.

Edited by rlh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, rlh said:

Oakland wasn't a state title game.  We got hammered by Cloudland in the 2001 semifinal game up there and by Gordy in the 1st round in 2006. That said, these guys calling for a blowout must think they can hang around with Oakland.

Nobody in the right mind thinks McKenzie can stay on the field with Oakland. I am sure Oakland could have beat So. Pittsburg as bad as they wanted too. I give So. Pittsburg all the credit in the world for scheduling that game. Imo McKenzie is at least 2 tds better than So. Pittsburg. In noway I'm am saying that So. Pittsburg cannot win this game but they will have to play a complete game and their best game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, lakecounty1968 said:

Nobody in the right mind thinks McKenzie can stay on the field with Oakland. I am sure Oakland could have beat So. Pittsburg as bad as they wanted too. I give So. Pittsburg all the credit in the world for scheduling that game. Imo McKenzie is at least 2 tds better than So. Pittsburg. In noway I'm am saying that So. Pittsburg cannot win this game but they will have to play a complete game and their best game.

I concur!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, rlh said:

Oakland wasn't a state title game.  We got hammered by Cloudland in the 2001 semifinal game up there and by Gordy in the 1st round in 2006. That said, these guys calling for a blowout must think they can hang around with Oakland.

Come on man ain’t nobody staying that and if they are they are ludicrous!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...