Jump to content

Top 6A takes on top DivII-AA when Oakland Host Lipscomb Academy


Blaze45

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, FridayFootballFan said:

Food for thought to help you make your prediction

Oakland 31 - 13 over Madison Ridge Academy (MRA)

Pulaski Academy 63-39 over MRA

Lipscomb Academy 64-28 over Pulaski Academy

so, I think LA can score, but I will say Oakland by 7

Looks like the defense is marginal at best in the private games.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, TSSAAdaddy said:

Oh he does. Connections with great talent, college coaches and high school coaches. And most parts of it can be "legit". Anyway looking forward to seeing Buck's recruits against Dilfer's recruits.

From his post on Volquest he seems more attached to the LA kids than Oakland’s. Being from Nashville and playing at Pearl-Cohn, I would have thought he was more of a recruiter for the Nashville schools. But he send Creasy a lot of players?? He also gives LA the slight edge in this game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FridayFootballFan said:

Food for thought to help you make your prediction

Oakland 31 - 13 over Madison Ridge Academy (MRA)

Pulaski Academy 63-39 over MRA

Lipscomb Academy 64-28 over Pulaski Academy

so, I think LA can score, but I will say Oakland by 7

I would assume that LA and Pulaski Arkansas both run up tempo passing attacks.  LA will have to score on every possession to have a chance because Oakland will be running some clock chewing  ground and pound offense and they will certainly put points on the board.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DealLawyer said:

From his post on Volquest he seems more attached to the LA kids than Oakland’s. Being from Nashville and playing at Pearl-Cohn, I would have thought he was more of a recruiter for the Nashville schools. But he send Creasy a lot of players?? He also gives LA the slight edge in this game.  

The two best skilled players in the private school metro, UGA and Miami commits transfer and end up at the same high school. I will still take Buck's recruits over Dilfer's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, ttitan27 said:

I would assume that LA and Pulaski Arkansas both run up tempo passing attacks.  LA will have to score on every possession to have a chance because Oakland will be running some clock chewing  ground and pound offense and they will certainly put points on the board.

 

 

The one thing I would say is that everyone is sleeping on LA's defense.  It is legit.  11 starters that only play defense except for #80.  He plays a little TE.  They are big up front and linebackers are good sized as well.  LA may get beat but I think it won't be because the are out physicaled but because they just get outplayed....semantics maybe, but Lipscomb matches up well with any team from a size standpoint.....my 2 cents. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TTate said:

The one thing I would say is that everyone is sleeping on LA's defense.  It is legit.  11 starters that only play defense except for #80.  He plays a little TE.  They are big up front and linebackers are good sized as well.  LA may get beat but I think it won't be because the are out physicaled but because they just get outplayed....semantics maybe, but Lipscomb matches up well with any team from a size standpoint.....my 2 cents. 

 

You are the very first person to even mention the defense in any detail that I can recall since the thread started.  I certainly haven't slept on them but just didn't know anything about them.  From a size standpoint I really didn't think Oakland would have a great advantage if any at all.  What Oakland has on defense is great speed and lots of depth.  I've seen lots of teams hang with Oakland for a quarter or maybe even into the second quarter a little but then Oaklands depth will kick in.   

Looking for a good competitive game but I do think Oakland in the end will win by 21.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • I don't know what's going on in the town of McMinnville, but I've read this and it's disturbing.  I'm a "player" person, and I want what's best for the player. If a player gets cut off the team because she said the "F word" then good grief. I mean, come on guys. I wish there was a way for the player to transfer to a different program and just play ball. There are a lot of athletes that are stuck because they're in crappy situations regarding their team/coach. This is player just happens to be one them.
    • Won't happen. College coaches will back the coach every time and it cost this young lady her senior season. Looks like the player may be right on this one. School let her  go after one season. This stuff happens more than you think. 
    • “No college is going to offer a scholarship to a player that is kicked off of the team.” For language? I’m not seeing that as a dealbreaker. 
    • Why did the coach get rehired after she was let go as an assistant by the former Warren County coach and the current AD?? Is that accurate?? I am very familiar with situations like this. Suprised lawsuits haven't happend before. If the coach unfairly let the player go, I think she has a shot because it cost her a scholarship. No college is going to offer a scholarship to a player that is kicked off of the team. Not going to happen. There are bad hires like this a bunch and kids are treated unfairly by coaches that can't coach a lick and have super long ropes somehow. Amazing how some of these coaches get hired and keep their job. 
    • I am going to assume you are not a lawyer, and most reasonable lawyers would not say the lawsuit has a zero percent chance in court. I agree with you that a coach has the ability to dismiss anyone from a team. However, Ms. Winfree was never presented with the opportunity to present her witnesses and have them tell the coaches and administrators what they heard. A lawyer could better explain the lawsuit and the grounds to you. Before you start making wild assumptions about the lawsuit, would it be too much to ask that you do a little legal research first? The lawsuit is dealing with due process, loss of property, and defamation.   You can read the lawsuit here: https://bdnewsletter.files.wordpress.com/2024/04/doc-1-complaint-filed-4-18-2024.pdf  
×
  • Create New...